Steven Wevodau Insurance News

PMA Capital Reports Improved Third Quarter 2009 Results

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

  • Press Release
  • Source: PMA Capital Corporation
  • On 4:06 pm EST, Tuesday November 3, 2009

BLUE BELL, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–PMA Capital Corporation (NASDAQ:PMACA - News) today reported the following financial results for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009:

    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)   2009   2008   2009   2008
Operating income before gain on sale of real estate   $ 6,732     $ 6,405     $ 18,622     $ 16,593  
Gain on sale of real estate after tax     -       -       -       1,378  
Operating income     6,732       6,405       18,622       17,971  
Realized investment gains (losses) after tax     517       (5,154 )     697       (3,239 )
Income from continuing operations     7,249       1,251       19,319       14,732  
Loss from discontinued operations after tax     (40 )     (2,310 )     (1,291 )     (4,937 )
Net income (loss)   $ 7,209     $ (1,059 )   $ 18,028     $ 9,795  
                 

Diluted per share amounts:

               
Operating income   $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.58     $ 0.56  
Realized investment gains (losses) after tax     0.01       (0.16 )     0.02       (0.10 )
Income from continuing operations     0.22       0.04       0.60       0.46  
Loss from discontinued operations after tax     -       (0.07 )     (0.04 )     (0.15 )
Net income (loss)   $ 0.22     $ (0.03 )   $ 0.56     $ 0.31  
                                 

Vincent T. Donnelly, President and Chief Executive Officer commented, “PMA Capital produced improved operating results and book value growth in the quarter. We continued to grow our core insurance business, while maintaining disciplined underwriting standards in a price competitive environment, and had significant growth in the revenues of our Fee-based Business. Our combined ratio remained below 97% and for the first quarter since early 2006 our pricing on rate-sensitive workers’ compensation business increased. The Company’s book value grew by 8% in the quarter and 15% in the first nine months of 2009 to $12.38 per share, reflecting improved values in our investment portfolio combined with our earnings.”

At The PMA Insurance Group, Mr. Donnelly noted the following significant operating highlights:

 

  • Pre-tax operating income increased to $13.6 million in the quarter, from $13.3 million in the third quarter of 2008, and increased to $38.8 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $38.3 million in the same period last year. The prior year-to-date results included a gain of $2.1 million from the sale of real estate;
  • The combined ratio was 95.8% in the quarter, which improved the year-to-date ratio to 96.2%;
  • Net investment income increased 7% in the quarter and 2% year-to-date, compared to the same periods last year, as the increase in investment portfolio assets more than offset the decrease in investment yields; and
  • Direct premium production, which excludes fronting premiums and premium adjustments, increased 3% in the third quarter to $154.8 million, and increased 3% during the first nine months of 2009 to $404.3 million.

 

Mr. Donnelly added, “We are continuing to grow our Fee-based Business, with revenues increasing 9% in the quarter and 16% for the first nine months of 2009 as a result of organic growth and our prior year acquisition of PMA Management Corp. of New England. Organic growth of claims service revenues was 9% in the quarter and 12% during the first nine months of 2009. Our Fee-based Business revenues of $59.8 million represent 15% of our total revenues in 2009. Pre-tax operating income for our Fee-based Business was $1.6 million in the quarter, compared to $1.9 million for the same period last year, and $5.1 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $5.3 million for the same period in 2008.”

The Company previously announced the execution of a definitive stock purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) to sell its Run-off Operations and the filing of a Form A with the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. On November 3, 2009, additional information regarding the Form A was filed with the Department. Subject to the approval of the transaction by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department under the revised terms, the Company would make a capital contribution of $13 million at the closing of the sale. This contribution will include cash of $3 million and a note payable in two equal installments of $5 million in 2010 and 2011. The revised terms also include capital support agreements provided by the Company to the Run-off Operations in the event that its payments on claims in the excess workers’ compensation and certain excess liability (occurrence) lines of business exceed certain pre-established limits. Such support is limited to an amount not to exceed $46 million and any payments with respect to the supported lines of business are not expected to commence until 2018 and may extend to 2052. Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles guidance for Guarantees, which requires guarantees to be recorded at fair value at inception, the Company estimates that the fair value of the capital support is approximately $13 million. Upon the closing of the transaction, the Company expects to record an after-tax charge of approximately $17 million, or $0.52 per share, to record the impact of the capital contribution and the additional capital support. The Company and the buyer have mutually agreed to extend the Agreement termination date to December 31, 2009.

Financial Condition

Total assets were $2.6 billion as of September 30, 2009, compared to $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2008. Assets of discontinued operations represented 7% of total assets at September 30, 2009, compared to 10% at December 31, 2008. At September 30, 2009, we had $33.7 million in cash and short-term investments at our holding company and non-regulated subsidiaries.

Shareholders’ equity and book value per share changed as follows:

    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30, 2009   September 30, 2009

 

  Shareholders’   Book value   Shareholders’   Book value

(in thousands, except per share data)

  equity   per share   equity   per share
Balance, beginning of period   $ 368,998   $ 11.45   $ 344,656   $ 10.78  
Net income     7,209     0.22     18,028     0.56  
Unrealized gain on securities, net of tax     22,721     0.71     35,105     1.09  
Other     244     -     1,383     0.04  
Impact of change in shares outstanding     -     -     -     (0.09 )
Balance, end of period   $ 399,172   $ 12.38   $ 399,172   $ 12.38  
                 

The insurance companies within The PMA Insurance Group had statutory capital and surplus of $385.1 million as of September 30, 2009, compared to $332.9 million as of December 31, 2008. The increase in capital and surplus during 2009 related primarily to statutory net income, which included a benefit from the second quarter commutation of a reinsurance agreement with an affiliated entity. The PMA Insurance Group has the ability to pay $31.8 million in dividends during 2009 without the prior approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department.

Segment Operating Results

Operating income, which we define as net income (loss) under GAAP excluding net realized investment gains and losses and results from discontinued operations, is the financial performance measure used by our management and Board of Directors to evaluate and assess the results of our businesses. Net realized investment activity is excluded because (i) net realized investment gains and losses are unpredictable and not necessarily indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments and (ii) in many instances, decisions to buy and sell securities are made at the holding company level, and such decisions result in net realized gains and losses that do not relate to the operations of the individual segments. Operating income does not replace net income (loss) as the GAAP measure of our consolidated results of operations.

The following is a reconciliation of our operating results to GAAP net income (loss):

    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2009   2008   2009   2008
Pre-tax operating income (loss):                
The PMA Insurance Group   $ 13,616     $ 13,325     $ 38,768     $ 38,285  
Fee-based Business     1,574       1,929       5,112       5,316  
Corporate & Other     (4,768 )     (5,319 )     (14,935 )     (15,754 )
Pre-tax operating income     10,422       9,935       28,945       27,847  
Income tax expense     3,690       3,530       10,323       9,876  
Operating income     6,732       6,405       18,622       17,971  
Realized investment gains (losses) after tax     517       (5,154 )     697       (3,239 )
Income from continuing operations     7,249       1,251       19,319       14,732  
Loss from discontinued operations after tax     (40 )     (2,310 )     (1,291 )     (4,937 )
Net income (loss)   $ 7,209     $ (1,059 )   $ 18,028     $ 9,795  
                 

Income from continuing operations included the following after-tax net realized gains (losses):

         
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2009   2008   2009   2008
Net realized investment gains (losses) after tax:                
Sales of investments   $ 517   $ 792     $ 3,907     $ 2,725  
Other than temporary impairments     -     (5,946 )     (3,210 )     (5,946 )
Other     -     -       -       (18 )
Net realized investment gains (losses) after tax   $ 517   $ (5,154 )   $ 697     $ (3,239 )
                               

We recorded other than temporary impairments of $3.2 million after-tax during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The impairments in the first nine months of 2009 related primarily to write-downs of $2.9 million on $45.9 million par of commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) that we sold in order to reduce our exposure to this asset sector. These write-downs were measured based on public market prices. At September 30, 2009, our CMBS had an average credit rating of AAA and fair value of $81.4 million, which represented 93% of their amortized cost. The prior year other than temporary impairments resulted from writing down our investments of Lehman Brothers senior debt and Fannie Mae preferred stock. Details of the Company’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are posted on our website at www.pmacapital.com.

The PMA Insurance Group

The PMA Insurance Group reported pre-tax operating income of $13.6 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared to $13.3 million for the same period last year. Year-to-date pre-tax operating income increased to $38.8 million, compared to $38.3 million for the first nine months of 2008. The results for the first nine months of 2008 included a gain of $2.1 million from the sale of a property that housed one of our branch offices.

Direct premium production increased during the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, compared to the same periods last year. We define direct premium production as direct premiums written, excluding fronting premiums and premium adjustments. The following is a reconciliation of our direct premium production to consolidated gross premiums written:

    Three months ended   Nine months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2009   2008   2009   2008
                 
Direct premium production   $ 154,754     $ 150,547     $ 404,333     $ 393,891  
Fronting premiums     10,890       2,776       40,189       13,032  
Premium adjustments     (3,521 )     (5,008 )     (11,150 )     (18,836 )
Direct premiums written     162,123       148,315       433,372       388,087  
Assumed premiums and other     2,216       3,183       8,461       8,611  
Gross premiums written   $ 164,339     $ 151,498     $ 441,833     $ 396,698  
                 

Fronting premiums increased in 2009 primarily as a result of the two fronting arrangements we entered into during August 2008. The decrease in premium adjustments in 2009 primarily reflected a lower amount of return premium adjustments on loss-sensitive products where the insured shares in the underwriting result of the policy. We write these retrospective products because we believe they provide us with greater certainty in achieving our targeted underwriting results as the customer shares in the underwriting result of the policy with us.

Excluding fronting business, we wrote $28.2 million and $99.7 million of new business in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, compared to $39.4 million and $99.8 million during the same periods last year. Pricing on our workers’ compensation rate-sensitive business increased 1% during the third quarter of 2009, compared to a 7% decrease during the third quarter last year, and on a year-to-date basis, it declined 1% during 2009, compared to a 7% decrease during 2008. Payrolls on our renewal customer base decreased by 1% in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. Our renewal retention rates on existing workers’ compensation accounts were 84% for the third quarter and 81% for the first nine months of 2009, compared to 88% and 86% for the same periods last year. The decline in the retention rates in 2009 primarily reflected lower retentions on rate-sensitive middle-market business as we continue to maintain disciplined underwriting standards in a price competitive environment. While retention rates were also down on loss-sensitive workers’ compensation business, the decrease was lower than that on rate-sensitive business and retention rates remained higher for business written on a loss-sensitive basis than for business written on a rate-sensitive basis, reflecting our strategy to emphasize loss-sensitive business.

Net premiums earned were $102.6 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $98.1 million in the third quarter of 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, net premiums earned increased to $314.8 million, from $286.9 million for the first nine months of 2008. The increases in both periods reflect the increase in direct premiums written over the past year.

The combined ratio on a GAAP basis was 95.8% for the third quarter of 2009, compared to 95.2% in the third quarter last year. The higher combined ratio in the third quarter of 2009 was the result of increases in the policyholders’ dividend and expense ratios, which were partially offset by a decrease in the loss and LAE ratio. The decrease between periods in the loss and LAE ratio primarily reflected the impact of the Company’s managed care initiatives, and also related to modest favorable prior year development in our captive business. The higher policyholders’ dividend ratio was primarily in our captive business and reflected better than anticipated underwriting and investment results in many of the captive programs. In this business, the policyholders may receive a dividend based, to a large extent, on their program’s underwriting and investment results. The increase in the expense ratio reflected higher state based assessments.

On a year-to-date basis, the combined ratio was 96.2% in 2009, compared to 96.5% for the same period in 2008. The improvement in the combined ratio for the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of last year, was primarily the result of a lower expense ratio, which was partially offset by an increased policyholders’ dividend ratio.

The loss and LAE ratio remained relatively flat in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the prior year period, as the lower loss experience on our captive accounts business was offset by the first quarter reduction in audit premiums. While payrolls on our renewal book have been stable overall, the 1% decrease was lower than the rate of growth we experienced in 2008. As a result of the decrease, we reduced our accrual for additional audit premiums by $3.3 million during the first quarter of 2009. Key loss indicators are in line with our expectations for this business, and we will continue to evaluate loss activity on these accounts as they mature, but we did not reduce our expectation of losses on these policies, which were primarily written in 2007 and 2008. Although pricing changes coupled with payroll inflation for rate-sensitive workers’ compensation business were below overall estimated loss trends, our current accident year loss and LAE ratio remained consistent between periods as we continued to benefit in the first nine months of 2009 from changes in the type of workers’ compensation products selected by our insureds and from our managed care initiatives. We estimate our medical cost inflation to be 6.0% in the first nine months of 2009, compared to our estimate of 6.5% in the first nine months of 2008.

The expense ratio for the first nine months of 2009, compared to the same period last year, benefited as the increase in net premiums earned outpaced the 2% increase in our controllable expenses, which include salary, benefits and other employee-related costs. Commissions earned under our fronting arrangements reduced the acquisition expense ratios by 0.7 points for the third quarter and 0.6 points for the first nine months of 2009, compared to 0.4 points and 0.7 points for the same periods in 2008, as the ceding commissions earned on this business reduce our commission expense.

Net investment income increased to $9.4 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $8.8 million in the prior year quarter. Net investment income was $27.4 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $26.8 million for the first nine months of 2008. The increases in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 were due primarily to increases in average invested assets, which were partially offset by lower investment yields.

Fee-based Business

For the third quarter of 2009, total revenues at our Fee-based Business increased to $20.6 million, from $18.8 million for the same period in 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, total revenues increased to $59.8 million, compared to $51.5 million for the first nine months of 2008. The increases in revenues primarily reflected increases in claims service revenues of $1.4 million and $9.2 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009. The year-to-date increase in claims service revenues was partially offset by a decline in commission income of $1.2 million. Organic claims service revenue growth was 9% in the quarter and 12% in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the same periods a year ago. Claims service revenues also increased as a result of our June 2008 acquisition of PMA Management Corp. of New England, Inc.

Our Fee-based Business reported pre-tax operating income of $5.1 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $5.3 million for the same period last year. The year-to-date results were reduced by lower net commissions earned by our agency business. The decline in net commissions was partially offset by claims service revenues that increased at a faster rate than operating expenses. For the third quarter, pre-tax operating income was $1.6 million, compared to $1.9 million for the same period last year. The decline in the quarter was due to operating expenses increasing at a higher rate than the increase in revenues.

Corporate and Other

The Corporate and Other segment, which includes primarily corporate expenses and debt service, reported net expenses of $4.8 million during the third quarter of 2009, compared to $5.3 million in the third quarter of 2008. Net expenses were $14.9 million during the first nine months of 2009, compared to $15.8 million for the same period in 2008. The decreases in net expenses in 2009 related primarily to lower stock-based compensation expense and lower interest expense on variable rate debt.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations, which consists of our former reinsurance and excess and surplus lines businesses, had after-tax losses of $40,000 and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to after-tax losses of $2.3 million and $4.9 million for the same periods in 2008. The loss for the first nine months of 2009 reflects the write-down of our carrying value of the discontinued operations to zero. The loss for the first nine months of 2008 was due to an after-tax charge of $4.9 million for adverse loss development, including $2.3 million recorded in the third quarter.

Conference Call with Investors

As a reminder, we will hold a conference call with investors beginning at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 4th to review our third quarter 2009 results. The conference call will be available via a live webcast over the Internet at www.pmacapital.com. To access the webcast, enter the Investor Information section, click on News Releases and then click on the microphone icon. Please note that by accessing the conference call via the Internet, you will be in a listen-only mode.

The call-in numbers and passcodes for the conference call are as follows:

Live Call

 

Replay

888-679-8038 (Domestic)   888-286-8010 (Domestic)
617-213-4850 (International)   617-801-6888 (International)
Passcode 48446807   Passcode 51517488

You may pre-register for the conference call using the following link:
www.theconferencingservice.com/prereg/key.process?key=PM4JGCJTD

Pre-registering is not mandatory but is recommended as it will provide you immediate entry into the call and will facilitate the timely start of the conference. Pre-registration only takes a few moments and you may pre-register at anytime, including up to and after the call start time. Alternatively, if you would rather be placed into the call by an operator, please use the dial-in information above at least five minutes prior to the call start time.

A replay of the conference call will be available over the Internet or by dialing the call-in number for the replay and using the passcode. The replay will be available from approximately 11:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 4th until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 4th.

Quarterly Statistical Supplement

Our Third Quarter Statistical Supplement, which provides more detailed information about our results, is available on our website. Please see the Investor Information section of our website at www.pmacapital.com. You may also obtain a copy of this supplement by sending your request to:

PMA Capital Corporation
380 Sentry Parkway
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Attention: Investor Relations

Alternatively, you may make a request by telephone (610-397-5298) or by e-mail to InvestorRelations@pmacapital.com. We will also furnish a copy of this news release and the Statistical Supplement to the Securities and Exchange Commission on a Form 8-K. A copy of the Form 8-K will be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and the plans and objectives of its management. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “should” and “believe.” These forward-looking statements may include estimates, assumptions or projections and are based on currently available financial, competitive and economic data and the Company’s current operating plans. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to:

 

  • adequacy of reserves for claim liabilities, including reserves for potential environmental and asbestos claims;
  • any future lowering or loss of one or more of our financial strength and debt ratings, and the adverse impact that any such downgrade may have on our ability to compete and to raise capital, and our liquidity and financial condition;
  • adequacy and collectibility of reinsurance that we purchase;
  • uncertainty as to the price and availability of reinsurance on business we intend to write in the future, including reinsurance for terrorist acts;
  • the effects of emerging claims and coverage issues, including changing judicial interpretations of available coverage for certain insured losses;
  • the success with which our independent agents and brokers sell our products and our ability to collect payments from them;
  • legislative and regulatory changes that affect the cost of, or demand for, our products or otherwise affect our ability to conduct business, including any future action with respect to our business taken by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department and any future action taken by the federal government with respect to regulation of the insurance industry;
  • our concentration in workers’ compensation insurance, which makes us particularly susceptible to adverse changes in that industry segment;
  • our ability to consummate the sale of our Run-off Operations as described above in a timely manner;
  • severity of natural disasters and other catastrophes, including the impact of future acts of terrorism, in connection with insurance and reinsurance policies;
  • uncertainties related to possible terrorist activities or international hostilities and whether the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 is extended beyond its December 31, 2014 termination date;
  • our ability to effectively compete in the highly competitive property and casualty insurance industry;
  • adverse economic or regulatory developments in the eastern part of the United States, particularly those affecting Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey;
  • fluctuations in interest rates and other events that can adversely impact our investment portfolio;
  • disruptions in the financial markets that affect the value of our investment portfolio and our ability to sell our investments;
  • our ability to repay our indebtedness;
  • our ability to raise additional capital on financially favorable terms when required;
  • restrictions on our operations contained in any document governing our indebtedness;
  • the impact of future results on the value of recorded goodwill and other intangible assets and the recoverability of our deferred tax asset;
  • our ability to attract and retain qualified management personnel;
  • the outcome of any litigation against us;
  • provisions in our charter documents that can inhibit a change in control of our company; and
  • other factors or uncertainties disclosed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this press release. Forward-looking statements are not generally required to be publicly revised as circumstances change and we do not intend to update the forward-looking statements in this press release to reflect circumstances after the date of this press release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 
PMA Capital Corporation
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
     
   

Three months ended September 30,

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)   2009   2008
         
Gross premiums written   $ 164,339     $ 151,498  
         
Net premiums written   $ 119,259     $ 123,995  
         
Revenues:        
Net premiums earned   $ 102,428     $ 97,974  
Claims service revenues     17,112       15,696  
Commission income     2,747       2,637  
Net investment income     9,522       8,870  
Net realized investment gains (losses)     795       (7,929 )
Other revenues     259       125  
Total revenues     132,863       117,373  
         
Expenses:        
Losses and loss adjustment expenses     70,158       68,660  
Acquisition expenses     16,046       15,898  
Operating expenses     30,235       26,906  
Dividends to policyholders     2,786       1,169  
Interest expense     2,421       2,734  
Total losses and expenses     121,646       115,367  
         
Pre-tax income     11,217       2,006  
         
Income tax expense (benefit):        
Current     220       765  
Deferred     3,748       (10 )
Total income tax expense     3,968       755  
         
Income from continuing operations     7,249       1,251  
         
Loss from discontinued operations after tax     (40 )     (2,310 )
         
Net income (loss)   $ 7,209     $ (1,059 )
         
Income (loss) per share:        
         
Basic:        
Continuing Operations   $ 0.22     $ 0.04  
Discontinued Operations     -       (0.07 )
    $ 0.22     $ (0.03 )
         
Diluted:        
Continuing Operations   $ 0.22     $ 0.04  
Discontinued Operations     -       (0.07 )
    $ 0.22     $ (0.03 )
                 
 
PMA Capital Corporation
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
     
    Nine months ended September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)   2009   2008
         
Gross premiums written   $ 441,833     $ 396,698  
         
Net premiums written   $ 317,539     $ 316,924  
         
Revenues:        
Net premiums earned   $ 314,307     $ 286,490  
Claims service revenues     49,631       40,585  
Commission income     8,327       9,549  
Net investment income     27,540       27,345  
Net realized investment gains (losses)     1,072       (4,983 )
Other revenues     625       2,485  
Total revenues     401,502       361,471  
         
Expenses:        
Losses and loss adjustment expenses     219,427       200,154  
Acquisition expenses     52,752       50,114  
Operating expenses     86,160       76,586  
Dividends to policyholders     5,743       3,544  
Interest expense     7,403       8,209  
Total losses and expenses     371,485       338,607  
         
Pre-tax income     30,017       22,864  
         
Income tax expense:        
Current     729       916  
Deferred     9,969       7,216  
Total income tax expense     10,698       8,132  
         
Income from continuing operations     19,319       14,732  
         
Loss from discontinued operations after tax     (1,291 )     (4,937 )
         
Net income   $ 18,028     $ 9,795  
         
Income (loss) per share:        
         
Basic:        
Continuing Operations   $ 0.60     $ 0.46  
Discontinued Operations     (0.04 )     (0.15 )
    $ 0.56     $ 0.31  
         
Diluted:        
Continuing Operations   $ 0.60     $ 0.46  
Discontinued Operations     (0.04 )     (0.15 )
    $ 0.56     $ 0.31  
                 
 
PMA Capital Corporation
GAAP Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
 
    September 30,   December 31,
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)   2009   2008
Assets:        
Investments:        
Fixed maturities available for sale   $ 817,089     $ 719,048  
Short-term investments     62,004       45,066  
Other investments     22,669       8,127  
Total investments     901,762       772,241  
         
Cash     13,887       10,501  
Accrued investment income     6,918       6,513  
Premiums receivable     246,871       235,893  
Reinsurance receivables     807,245       826,126  
Prepaid reinsurance premiums     40,883       29,579  
Deferred income taxes, net     110,358       138,514  
Deferred acquisition costs     42,583       40,938  
Funds held by reinsureds     56,623       51,754  
Intangible assets     29,961       30,348  
Other assets     126,015       116,646  
Assets of discontinued operations     192,431       243,663  
Total assets   $ 2,575,537     $ 2,502,716  
         
Liabilities:        
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses   $ 1,259,940     $ 1,242,258  
Unearned premiums     261,952       247,415  
Debt     129,380       129,380  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

    250,304       216,266  
Reinsurance funds held and balances payable     52,914       44,177  
Dividends to policyholders     6,177       6,862  
Liabilities of discontinued operations     215,698       271,702  
Total liabilities     2,176,365       2,158,060  
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
Class A Common Stock     171,090       171,090  
Additional paid-in capital     112,349       112,921  
Retained earnings     152,670       140,184  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (13,947 )     (49,876 )
Treasury stock, at cost     (22,990 )     (29,663 )
Total shareholders’ equity     399,172       344,656  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 2,575,537     $ 2,502,716  
         
Shareholders’ equity per share   $ 12.38     $ 10.78  
                 

Contact:

PMA Capital Corporation
William E. Hitselberger, 610-397-5298
bhitselberger@pmacapital.com

Tags: ,

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009 Other, Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

The Hartford Announces Third Quarter 2009 Results - Steven Wevodau

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

  • Press Release
  • Source: The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
  • On 4:10 pm EST, Tuesday November 3, 2009

HARTFORD, Conn.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: HIG - News):

  • Operating Franchises Performing Well:
    • P&C Combined Ratio at 93.0%
    • Life Assets Under Management* Top $334 Billion
  • Core Earnings* of $660 Million, or $1.56 Per Diluted Share
  • Net Loss of $220 Million, or $0.79 Per Share, Driven by Impairments and Hedging Results
  • Book Value Per Share Jumps 18% From End of Second Quarter to $37.90
  • Net Unrealized Loss Declines More than 50% to $5.8 Billion
  • Capital Position Strong, Enhanced by $900 Million Equity Raise

 

The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: HIG - News) today reported its third quarter 2009 results. A summary of the company’s financial performance is provided in the following table.

Summary

 

(in millions except per share data)

  Quarterly Results
  3Q ‘09   3Q ‘08   Change
Net loss   $(220)   $(2,631)   92%

Net loss available to common shareholders
per diluted share

  $(0.79)   $(8.74)   91%
Core earnings (losses)*   $660   $(422)   NM

Core earnings (losses) available to
common shareholders per diluted share*

  $1.56   $(1.40)   NM
Assets under management*   $386,996   $384,981   1%
Book value per common share   $37.90   $41.80   (9%)
Book value per common share (ex. AOCI)*   $46.30   $55.63   (17%)

*Denotes financial measures not calculated based on generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”). More information is provided in the Discussion of Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures section below.

“The Hartford’s third quarter core earnings results demonstrate a resilient company that is emerging from the challenges of the last 18 months,” said Liam E. McGee, The Hartford’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “In my first month on the job, I have found that the core attributes that initially drew me to The Hartford are sound. The company today has a strong capital foundation; a trusted, well-respected, 200-year-old brand; solid operating franchises; positive relationships with its distribution partners; and a dedicated group of employees committed to winning in the marketplace.

“There are clearly challenges, including the economy and the potential for a second downturn in the equity and credit markets, as well as the performance of our investment portfolio. We remain focused on managing through these issues. Our protection and wealth management franchises are stable and performing well, we are seeing signs that business momentum is building, and the company is focused on its path forward,” added McGee.

The Hartford reported a third quarter 2009 net loss of $220 million, or $0.79 per diluted share, compared with a third quarter 2008 net loss of $2.6 billion, or $8.74 per diluted share. Core earnings for the third quarter of 2009 were $660 million, or $1.56 per diluted share, compared with a core loss of $422 million or $1.40 per diluted share, in the prior period.

Third quarter 2009 net income reflected a DAC unlock benefit of $63 million, after tax and third quarter 2009 core earnings included a $232 million benefit from the DAC unlock. The lower net income benefit relates to a $169 million charge primarily related to the company’s macro hedging program. Third quarter 2008 net income reflected a $932 million after-tax charge related to the DAC unlock, and third quarter 2008 core earnings reflected a $923 million after-tax charge related to the DAC unlock.

The net realized capital loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $885 million, after tax, primarily due to after-tax impairments of $336 million and an after-tax loss of $435 million from the company’s variable annuity hedging programs. Third quarter 2008 results included a net realized capital loss of $2.2 billion, after tax.

REVIEW OF BUSINESS UNIT RESULTS

 

Property and Casualty Operations

Written premiums* for The Hartford’s property and casualty operations in the third quarter were $2.4 billion, down 6% from the third quarter of 2008 largely as a result of weaker economic conditions which particularly affected commercial lines. The company is seeing momentum in new business submissions in all segments, but particularly strong in personal lines and small commercial.

Core earnings were $246 million, up 58% from the $156 million reported in the prior year period. Net income was $190 million for the third quarter of 2009, including the effect of a $58 million net realized capital loss. In the third quarter of 2008, property and casualty operations reported a net loss of $774 million, including the effect of a $929 million net realized capital loss.

The current accident year combined ratio for ongoing operations in the third quarter of 2009, excluding catastrophes, was 93.8%, compared with 91.8% in the prior-year period. The third quarter of 2009 included $135 million, or 5.5 points, of net favorable prior year development primarily related to small commercial and middle market workers compensation, professional liability, personal lines auto liability and middle market general liability claims.

Personal Lines

Personal lines written premiums for the third quarter of 2009 grew 2% over the prior-year period to $1.0 billion. Written premiums in the company’s agency business rose 4% in the third quarter, with AARP written premiums up 2% over the prior period. New business premium was very strong, increasing 26% over the third quarter of 2008, while the number of policies in force grew 2% year-over-year as investments in new products and increased consumer shopping continued to drive new business submissions. During the quarter, the company continued its successful launch of its AARP product through agents, with the product already in 14 states, and 6 additional states rolling out in the fourth quarter.

The third quarter 2009 current accident year combined ratio, excluding catastrophes, was 94.5%, compared to 88.3% in the prior-year period. The increase in the combined ratio was largely due to current accident year reserve strengthening, in response to an uptick in auto frequency and lower average premium. The third quarter of 2009 included 9.1 points of current accident year catastrophes related to significant hail and wind storms in the Midwest and Colorado.

Small Commercial

Written premiums for small commercial were $626 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared with $652 million in the prior year period. The decline in year-over-year written premium was driven by weaker economic conditions that have resulted in business closings and an overall reduction in exposures as businesses reduce coverages and shrink payrolls. New business premium was up 20% over the prior-year period as product enhancements made in 2009 had a positive impact and the company capitalized on policyholder shopping.

Third quarter 2009 profitability continued to be very strong, with a current accident year combined ratio, excluding catastrophes, of 86.0% as compared to 87.7% in the third quarter of 2008. The third quarter of 2009 included 2.9 points of current accident year catastrophes.

Middle Market

Written premiums for middle market were $496 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared with $571 million in the year-ago period. Written premiums were lower due mainly to weaker economic conditions combined with the company’s ongoing disciplined approach to evaluating and pricing risks. The company continued to target profitable growth opportunities in a highly competitive environment.

The third quarter 2009 current accident year combined ratio, excluding catastrophes, was 97.0%, compared with 98.4% in the prior-year period. The third quarter of 2009 included 1.2 points of current accident year catastrophes and $52 million, or 10.1 points, of net favorable prior year development largely related to workers’ compensation and general liability.

Specialty Commercial

In specialty commercial, written premiums for the third quarter of 2009 were $266 million as compared to $345 million in the year-ago period. Premiums were driven lower by a combination of the effects of the economic downturn, the sale of First State Management Group, which contributed $14 million of premium in the third quarter of 2008, and lower net premiums resulting from changes in a reinsurance treaty.

The third quarter 2009 current accident year combined ratio, excluding catastrophes, was 102.6% as compared with 99.0% in the third quarter of 2008. The third quarter of 2009 included $39 million, or 13.0 points, of net favorable prior year development primarily related to professional liability.

 

Life Operations

Life operations assets under management were $334.3 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2009, essentially flat compared with $333.3 billion as of September 30, 2008 and up 11% from the end of the second quarter of 2009. Core earnings for the third quarter of 2009 were $499 million, up from core losses of $541 million in the prior year period.

Life reported a net loss of $323 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with a net loss of $1.8 billion in the year-ago period. The third quarter of 2009 net loss included a $62 million after-tax benefit related to the DAC unlock and an $825 million net realized capital loss. The third quarter of 2008 included a $941 million after-tax charge related to the DAC unlock and a $1.3 billion net realized capital loss.

INDIVIDUAL MARKETS

Retail Products Group

Total retail products assets under management were $136.6 billion at September 30, 2009, compared with $146.4 billion at September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of equity market declines over the last 12 months. Assets under management increased 11% sequentially from the $123.3 billion reported at the end of the second quarter of 2009, as a result of recent market improvement. The net loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $172 million, and included a $69 million benefit related to the DAC unlock, as well as a net realized capital loss of $499 million, driven by a combination of losses on the company’s variable annuity hedging programs and impairments on the investment portfolio. This compares with a third quarter 2008 net loss of $822 million, which included a DAC unlock charge of $732 million and a net realized capital loss of $283 million.

Variable annuity deposits for the quarter were $622 million, compared to $1.9 billion in the prior-year period. The year-over-year decline was due primarily to the company’s product feature and pricing changes. Third quarter 2009 variable annuity net outflows were $1.7 billion, compared with $1.5 billion in the prior year period.

In October, the company introduced The Hartford’s Personal Retirement Manager, an innovative new product that combines two traditional retirement planning approaches, long-term investment growth and guaranteed lifetime income potential, in a single, user-friendly, tax-deferred retirement planning vehicle.

Mutual fund deposits were $3.1 billion in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $3.6 billion in the prior-year period. Strong mutual fund performance in the third quarter contributed to sales, with 65% of The Hartford’s retail mutual funds outperforming their Morningstar peers in the third quarter of 2009. Net sales were $779 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $816 million in the prior year period.

Individual Life

Third quarter 2009 sales for individual life were $45 million, down from $69 million in the prior-year period due to equity market volatility and disruption in the wirehouse and bank distribution channels. Life insurance in-force rose 4% over the prior-year period, primarily driven by a 13% increase in term life insurance, as customer demand shifted to fixed products.

Individual life reported net income of $4 million for the third quarter of 2009, including a net realized capital loss of $24 million and a $24 million charge related to the DAC unlock. Net loss for the third quarter of 2008 was $102 million, which included a net realized capital loss of $111 million and a $44 million charge related to the DAC unlock.

EMPLOYER MARKETS

Retirement Plans

Retirement plans assets under management were $42.7 billion at September 30, 2009, compared with $43.3 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2008. Sequentially, assets under management were up notably from the $38.8 billion reported at the end of the second quarter of 2009 due primarily to recent equity market performance. Total deposits were $1.8 billion in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $2.3 billion in the prior-year period. During the quarter, The Hartford and Lord Abbett entered into a strategic alliance to offer Lord Abbett’s 401(k) plan sponsors the ability to transition their plans to The Hartford. Lord Abbett manages nearly 8,000 bundled small 401(k) plans comprising more than 59,000 participants and more than $1.2 billion in assets.

Retirement plans reported a net loss of $34 million for the third quarter of 2009, driven by a net realized capital loss of $49 million. This compares to a net loss of $160 million in the prior-year period, which included a net realized capital loss of $123 million and a $49 million charge related to the DAC unlock.

Group Benefits

Group benefits fully insured sales were $122 million in the third quarter, compared with sales of $158 million in the prior-year period largely due to the economic and competitive environment. Fully insured premiums were $1.1 billion for the third quarter of 2009, down 4% from the prior-year period. The decrease was primarily related to the effects of the economic downturn, including lower payrolls, while persistency remained high.

Group benefits reported net income for the third quarter of 2009 of $65 million, up from a net loss of $186 million in the prior-year period. The third quarter of 2009 included a net realized capital loss of $20 million compared with a net realized capital loss of $287 million in the third quarter of 2008.

INTERNATIONAL MARKETS

As a result of the company’s decision to suspend writing new business in Japan, variable annuity deposits in Japan for the third quarter of 2009 were $17 million, down from $868 million in the third quarter of 2008. Net outflows for variable annuities were $249 million for the third quarter of 2009.

International operations reported a third quarter 2009 net loss of $32 million, including an $18 million benefit related to the DAC unlock and a net realized capital loss of $107 million. Third quarter 2008 net loss was $107 million and included a net realized capital loss of $36 million and a DAC unlock charge of $116 million.

INSTITUTIONAL MARKETS

Institutional deposits for the third quarter of 2009 were $623 million, compared with $850 million in the prior-year period, with the majority of the deposits in institutional mutual funds. The decline in deposits was primarily driven by the company’s decision to cease writing new business in certain lines. Institutional reported a third quarter 2009 net loss of $101 million, which included a net realized capital loss of $94 million, compared with a net loss of $393 million in the year-ago period, which included a net realized capital loss of $394 million.

INVESTMENTS

The Hartford’s total investments, excluding trading securities, were $96 billion as of September 30, 2009, compared to $89 billion as of December 31, 2008. Net investment income, excluding trading securities, was $1.0 billion, before tax, in the third quarter of 2009, a decline of 5% from the prior-year period. The decline was primarily due to lower interest rates as well as the company’s decision to increase its allocation to short-term investments.

Impairments were $536 million, pre-tax, in the third quarter of 2009. The majority of impairments were related to potential future credit losses on certain structured securities.

Net unrealized losses on investments were $5.8 billion, pre-tax, as of September 30, 2009, compared with $13.2 billion as of December 31, 2008. The improvement was driven by significant spread tightening across virtually all fixed maturity asset classes in the second and third quarter of 2009, partially offset by the implementation of new impairment accounting guidance.

2009 GUIDANCE

Based on the assumptions below, The Hartford currently expects 2009 core earnings per diluted share to be between $0.85 and $1.05. The company’s previous guidance for 2009 core earnings per diluted share was between $0.00 and $0.20. The guidance contained within this news release is subject to unusual or unpredictable benefits or charges that might occur in 2009, as well as factors noted below. Historically, the company has frequently experienced unusual or unpredictable benefits and charges that were not anticipated in previously provided guidance.

This guidance assumes the following:

– U.S. equity markets produce an annualized return of 9.0% (including 7.2% stock appreciation and 1.8% dividends) from the S&P 500 level of 1,057 on September 30, 2009;

– This guidance incorporates no estimate of the effect of any fourth quarter 2009 unlock of the account values and related assumptions underlying the company’s estimate of future gross profits used in the determination of certain asset and liability balances, principally life deferred acquisition costs;

– A fourth quarter 2009 restructuring charge of $30 million, after tax;

– Preferred dividends and amortization of discount of $128 million on the cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued under the Capital Purchase Program;

– A full year, pre-tax underwriting loss of $225 million from other operations in property and casualty. In the last several years, underwriting losses in other operations have differed materially from the assumptions incorporated in guidance;

– A full year catastrophe ratio of 3.6% to 4.0%;

– A pre-tax annualized yield on limited partnerships and other alternative investments of (21%); and

– Diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 364 million for full year 2009.

Markets worldwide have experienced persistent volatility and disruption, due largely to the stresses affecting the global financial system, which accelerated significantly in the second half of 2008 and continued into 2009. The United States, Europe and Japan have entered severe recessions that are likely to persist well into the second half of 2009 and perhaps into 2010, despite governmental intervention in the world’s major economies. The likelihood that the company’s 2009 earnings guidance will turn out to be incorrect is increased by virtue of these conditions. The company’s actual experience in 2009 will almost certainly differ from many of the assumptions described above, and investors should consider the risks and uncertainties that may cause the company’s actual results to differ from the 2009 earnings guidance, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the discussion of forward looking statements at the end of this release and the risk factors included in the company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, and September 30, 2009, and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

CONFERENCE CALL

The Hartford will discuss its third quarter 2009 results in a conference call on Wednesday, November 4 at 8:00 a.m. EST. The call, along with a slide presentation, can be simultaneously accessed through The Hartford’s Web site at ir.thehartford.com.

More detailed financial information can be found in The Hartford’s Investor Financial Supplement for the third quarter of 2009, which is available on The Hartford’s Web site, ir.thehartford.com.

About The Hartford

Celebrating nearly 200 years, The Hartford (NYSE: HIG - News) is an insurance-based financial services company that serves households, businesses and employees by helping to protect their assets and income from risks, and by managing wealth and retirement needs. A Fortune 500 company, The Hartford is recognized widely for its service expertise and as one of the world’s most ethical companies. More information on the company and its financial performance is available at www.thehartford.com.

HIG-F

DISCUSSION OF NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Hartford uses non-GAAP and other financial measures in this press release to assist investors in analyzing the company’s operating performance for the periods presented herein. Because The Hartford’s calculation of these measures may differ from similar measures used by other companies, investors should be careful when comparing The Hartford’s non-GAAP and other financial measures to those of other companies.

The Hartford uses the non-GAAP financial measure core earnings (loss) as an important measure of the company’s operating performance. The Hartford believes that the measure core earnings provides investors with a valuable measure of the performance of the company’s ongoing businesses because it reveals trends in the company’s insurance and financial services businesses that may be obscured by the net effect of certain realized capital gains and losses. Some realized capital gains and losses are primarily driven by investment decisions and external economic developments, the nature and timing of which are unrelated to the insurance and underwriting aspects of the company’s business.

Accordingly, core earnings (loss) excludes the effect of all realized gains and losses (net of tax and the effects of deferred policy acquisition costs) that tend to be highly variable from period to period based on capital market conditions. The Hartford believes, however, that some realized capital gains and losses are integrally related to the company’s insurance operations, so core earnings (loss) includes net realized gains and losses such as net periodic settlements on credit derivatives and net periodic settlements on the Japan fixed annuity cross-currency swap. These net realized gains and losses are directly related to an offsetting item included in the statement of operations such as net investment income (loss). Core earnings (loss) is also used by management to assess the company’s operating performance and is one of the measures considered in determining incentive compensation for the company’s managers. Net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Core earnings (loss) should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss) and does not reflect the overall profitability of the company’s business. Therefore, The Hartford believes that it is useful for investors to evaluate both net income (loss) and core earnings (loss) when reviewing the company’s performance. A reconciliation of net income (loss) to core earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 is set forth in the results by segment table. The 2009 earnings guidance presented in this release is based in part on core earnings (loss). A quantitative reconciliation of The Hartford’s net income (loss) to core earnings (loss) is not calculable on a forward-looking basis because it is not possible to provide a reliable forecast of realized capital gains and losses, which typically vary substantially from period to period.

Core earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the non-GAAP financial measure core earnings (loss). The Hartford believes that the measure core earnings (loss) per share provides investors with a valuable measure of the company’s operating performance for many of the same reasons applicable to its underlying measure, core earnings (loss). Net income (loss) per share is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Core earnings (loss) per share should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss) per share and does not reflect the overall profitability of the company’s business. Therefore, The Hartford believes that it is useful for investors to evaluate both net income (loss) per share and core earnings (loss) per share when reviewing the company’s performance. A reconciliation of net income (loss) per share to core earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 is set forth on pages C-3 and C-4 of The Hartford’s Investor Financial Supplement for the third quarter of 2009.

Written premium is a statutory accounting financial measure used by The Hartford as an important indicator of the operating performance of the company’s property and casualty operations. Because written premium represents the amount of premium charged for policies issued, net of reinsurance, during a fiscal period, The Hartford believes it is useful to investors because it reflects current trends in The Hartford’s sale of property and casualty insurance products. Earned premium, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, represents all premiums that are recognized as revenues during a fiscal period. The difference between written premium and earned premium is attributable to the change in unearned premium reserves. A reconciliation of written premium to earned premium for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 is set forth on page PC-2 of The Hartford’s Investor Financial Supplement for the third quarter of 2009.

Book value per share excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) is calculated based upon a non-GAAP financial measure. It is calculated by dividing (a) stockholders’ equity excluding AOCI, net of tax, by (b) common shares outstanding.

The Hartford provides book value per share excluding AOCI to enable investors to analyze the amount of the company’s net worth that is primarily attributable to the company’s business operations. The Hartford believes book value per share excluding AOCI is useful to investors because it eliminates the effect of items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, primarily based on changes in interest rates. Book value per share is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. A reconciliation of book value per share to book value per share excluding AOCI as of September 30, 2008 and 2009 is set forth in the results by segment table.

Assets under management is an internal performance measure used by The Hartford because a significant portion of the company’s revenues are based upon asset values. These revenues increase or decrease with a rise or fall, correspondingly, in the level of assets under management. Assets under management is the sum of The Hartford’s total assets, mutual fund assets, and third-party assets managed by Hartford Investment Management Company.

The Hartford’s management evaluates profitability of the Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial underwriting segments primarily on the basis of underwriting results. Underwriting results is a before-tax measure that represents earned premiums less incurred losses, loss adjustment expenses and underwriting expenses. Net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Underwriting results are influenced significantly by earned premium growth and the adequacy of The Hartford’s pricing. Underwriting profitability over time is also greatly influenced by The Hartford’s underwriting discipline, which seeks to manage exposure to loss through favorable risk selection and diversification, its management of claims, its use of reinsurance and its ability to manage its expense ratio, which it accomplishes through economies of scale and its management of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses. The Hartford believes that underwriting results provides investors with a valuable measure of before-tax profitability derived from underwriting activities, which are managed separately from the company’s investing activities. Underwriting results are presented for Ongoing Operations, Other Operations and total Property and Casualty in The Hartford’s Investor Financial Supplement. A reconciliation of underwriting results to net income (loss) for total Property and Casualty, Ongoing Operations and Other Operations is set forth on pages PC-2, PC-3 and PC-13 of The Hartford’s Investor Financial Supplement for the third quarter of 2009.

A catastrophe is a severe loss, resulting from natural or man-made events, including fire, earthquake, windstorm, explosion, terrorist attack and similar events. Each catastrophe has unique characteristics. Catastrophes are not predictable as to timing or loss amount in advance, and therefore their effects are not included in earnings or losses and loss adjustment expense reserves prior to occurrence. The Hartford believes that a discussion of the effect of catastrophes is meaningful for investors to understand the variability of periodic earnings.

Some of the statements in this release should be considered forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements about The Hartford’s future results of operations. The Hartford cautions investors that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially. Investors should consider the important risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ. These important risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, uncertainties related to the depth and duration of the current recession and financial market conditions, which continue to pressure the Company’s capital position and adversely affect the Company’s business and results, the extent of the impact on the Company’s results and prospects of recent downgrades in the Company’s financial strength and credit ratings and the impact of any further downgrades on the Company’s business and results; the success of management’s initiatives to stabilize the Company’s ratings and mitigate and reduce risks associated with various business lines; the additional restrictions, oversight, costs and other potential consequences of the Company’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; changes in financial and capital markets, including changes in interest rates, credit spreads, equity prices and foreign exchange rates; the inability to effectively mitigate the impact of equity market volatility on the company’s financial position and results of operations arising from obligations under annuity product guarantees; the amount of statutory capital that the company has, changes to the statutory reserves and/or risk based capital requirements, and the company’s ability to hold and protect sufficient statutory capital to maintain financial strength and credit ratings; the possibility of general economic and business conditions that are less favorable than anticipated; the potential for differing interpretations of the methodologies, estimations and assumptions that underlie the valuation of the company’s financial instruments that could result in changes to investment valuations; the subjective determinations that underlie the company’s evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities; losses due to defaults by others; the availability of our commercial paper program; the potential for further acceleration of DAC amortization; the potential for further impairments of our goodwill; the difficulty in predicting the company’s potential exposure for asbestos and environmental claims; the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks; the response of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts and the availability, pricing and adequacy of reinsurance to protect the company against losses; the possibility of unfavorable loss development; the incidence and severity of catastrophes, both natural and man-made; stronger than anticipated competitive activity; unfavorable judicial or legislative developments; the potential effect of domestic and foreign regulatory developments, including those which could increase the company’s business costs and required capital levels; the company’s ability to distribute its products through distribution channels, both current and future; the uncertain effects of emerging claim and coverage issues; the ability of the company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends to the company; the company’s ability to adequately price its property and casualty policies; the ability to recover the company’s systems and information in the event of a disaster or other unanticipated event; potential for difficulties arising from outsourcing relationships; potential changes in federal or state tax laws, including changes impacting the availability of the separate account dividend received deduction; the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and defend against claims of infringement; and other risks and uncertainties discussed in The Hartford’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings The Hartford makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Hartford assumes no obligation to update this release, which speaks as of the date issued.

 

- Financial tables to follow -

THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

RESULTS BY SEGMENT

(in millions except per share data)

                         
   

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

LIFE   2008     2009     Change   2008     2009     Change
Retail Products Group   $ (822 )   $ (172 )   79 %   $ (729 )   $ (724 )   1 %
Individual Life     (102 )     4     NM       (52 )     2     NM  
Total Individual Markets Group     (924 )     (168 )   82 %     (781 )     (722 )   8 %
Group Benefits     (186 )     65     NM       (78 )     148     NM  
Retirement Plans     (160 )     (34 )   79 %     (134 )     (162 )   (21 %)
Total Employer Markets Group     (346 )     31     NM       (212 )     (14 )   93 %
International     (107 )     (32 )   70 %     (27 )     (206 )   NM  
Institutional Solutions Group     (393 )     (101 )   74 %     (543 )     (341 )   37 %
Other     (45 )     (53 )   (18 %)     (73 )     (122 )   (67 %)
Total Life net loss     (1,815 )     (323 )   82 %     (1,636 )     (1,405 )   14 %
Less: Net realized capital losses, after-tax and DAC [1]     (1,274 )     (822 )   35 %     (1,938 )     (1,016 )   48 %
Total Life core earnings (losses)     (541 )     499     NM       302       (389 )   NM  
                                 
PROPERTY & CASUALTY                                
Ongoing Operations                                
Ongoing Operations Underwriting Results                                
Personal Lines     (45 )     (11 )   76 %     78       54     (31 %)
Small Commercial     82       90     10 %     270       251     (7 %)
Middle Market     (37 )     61     NM       21       186     NM  
Specialty Commercial     (44 )     30     NM       13       89     NM  
Total Ongoing Operations underwriting results     (44 )     170     NM       382       580     52 %
Net servicing income     14       10     (29 %)     21       25     19 %
Net investment income     285       254     (11 %)     929       678     (27 %)
Other expenses     (58 )     (47 )   19 %     (180 )     (145 )   19 %
Net realized capital losses     (1,268 )     (79 )   94 %     (1,455 )     (448 )   69 %
Income tax expense (benefit)     (405 )     79     NM       (195 )     128     NM  
Ongoing Operations net loss     (666 )     229     NM       (108 )     562     NM  
                                 
Other Operations                                
Other Operations net loss     (108 )     (39 )   64 %     (91 )     (87 )   4 %
                                 
Total Property & Casualty net income (loss)     (774 )     190     NM       (199 )     475     NM  
Less: Net realized capital losses, after-tax [1]     (930 )     (56 )   94 %     (1,064 )     (304 )   71 %
Total Property & Casualty core earnings     156       246     58 %     865       779     (10 %)
                                 
CORPORATE                                
Total Corporate net loss     (42 )     (87 )   (107 %)     (108 )     (514 )   NM  
                                 
CONSOLIDATED                                
Net loss     (2,631 )     (220 )   92 %     (1,943 )     (1,444 )   26 %
Less: Net realized capital losses, after-tax and DAC [1]     (2,209 )     (880 )   60 %     (3,009 )     (1,551 )   48 %
Core earnings (losses)   $ (422 )   $ 660     NM     $ 1,066     $ 107     (90 %)
                                 
PER SHARE DATA                                
Diluted earnings per share                                
Net loss   $ (8.74 )   $ (0.79 )   91 %   $ (6.29 )   $ (4.52 )   28 %
Core earnings (losses)   $ (1.40 )   $ 1.56     NM     $ 3.44     $ 0.12     (96 %)
Book value per share                                
Book value per share (including AOCI)   $ 41.80     $ 37.90     (9 %)                
Per share impact of AOCI   $ (13.83 )   $ (8.40 )   39 %                
Book value per share (excluding AOCI)   $ 55.63     $ 46.30     (17 %)                

[1] Includes those net realized capital gains and losses not included in core earnings. See discussion of non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this release.

The Hartford defines increases or decreases greater than or equal to 200%, or changes from a net gain to a net loss position, or vice versa, as “NM” or not meaningful

The Hartford

Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Guidance

Full Year 2009 Core Earnings Per Diluted Share of $0.85 - $1.05

             

Property and Casualty

 

2009 Written Premium
Growth Compared to 2008

 

2009
Combined Ratio*

   
Ongoing Operations   (6.5%) - (4.5%)   91.0% - 93.0%    
             
Personal Lines   Flat - 2%   90.5% - 92.5%    
Auto   0.5% - 2.5%        
Homeowners   (0.5%) - 1.5%        
             
Small Commercial   (6%) - (4%)   84.0% - 86.0%    
             
Middle Market   (11%) - (9%)   94.0% - 96.0%    
             
Specialty Commercial   (18.5%) - (16.5%)   100.5% - 102.5%    
*Excludes catastrophes and prior-year development

Life

 

Deposits

 

Net Flows

 

Core Earnings ROA1

U.S. Individual Annuity           Individual Annuity
Full Year 2009 – Variable Annuity   $2.25 - $2.75 Billion   ($7.5) - ($7.0) Billion   30-34 bps
4Q09 – Variable Annuity   $0.225 - $0.725 Billion   ($2.25) - ($1.75) Billion    
Full Year 2009 – Fixed Annuity   $1.25 - $1.75 Billion   $0.25 - $0.75 Billion    
Japan Annuity           Japan Operations
Full Year 2009 – Variable Annuity           38 - 46 bps
Retail Mutual Funds           Other Retail
Full Year 2009   $11.5 - $12.0 Billion   $2.25 - $2.75 Billion   7-9 bps
4Q09   $3.0 - $3.5 Billion   $0.8 - $1.3 Billion    
Retirement Plans            
Full Year 2009   $7.5 - $8.5 Billion   ($1.0) - ($0.5) Billion   0-5 bps
4Q09   $2.0 - $2.5 Billion   $0.0 - $0.5 Billion    
Institutional Solutions Group            
Full Year 2009           (10) – (5) bps
Group Benefits (Full Year 2009)            
Fully Insured Premiums*   $4.3 - $4.4 Billion        
Loss Ratio   72% - 75%        
Expense Ratio   26% - 28%        
After-tax Margin**   5.0% - 6.0%        
* Guidance for fully insured premiums excludes buyout premiums and premium equivalents.

** Guidance on after-tax margin is core earnings divided by total core revenue, excluding buyout premiums.

Individual Life (Full Year 2009)            
Inforce Growth   3% - 4%        

After-tax Margin, excluding all DAC unlocks*

 

  11% - 13%        
* Guidance on after-tax margin is core earnings divided by total core revenue.

1 ROA outlooks exclude impact of all DAC unlocks

Contact:

The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Media Contact(s):
Shannon Lapierre, 860-547-5624
shannon.lapierre@thehartford.com
or
Debora Raymond, 860-547-9613
debora.raymond@thehartford.com
or
Investor Contact(s):
Rick Costello, 860-547-8480
richard.costello@thehartford.com
or
JR Reilly, 860-547-9140
jr.reilly@thehartford.com

Tags: ,

W. R. Berkley Corporation Names W. Robert Berkley, Jr. President and Chief Operating Officer - Posted by Steven Wevodau

  • Press Release
  • Source: W. R. Berkley Corporation
  • On 6:21 pm EST, Tuesday November 3, 2009

GREENWICH, Conn.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–W. R. Berkley Corporation (NYSE:WRB - News) today announced the election by the Board of Directors of W. Robert Berkley, Jr. as president and chief operating officer of the Company. The appointment is effective immediately.

As president and chief operating officer, W. Robert Berkley will manage all of the Company’s operating units, adding oversight of the Company’s reinsurance and international segments to his current responsibilities. He has been responsible for the oversight of the Company’s domestic insurance operations, including its specialty, regional and alternative markets businesses, since 2005.

W. Robert Berkley joined W. R. Berkley Corporation in 1997 and has served as its executive vice president since August 2005. In addition, he has served on the Company’s Board of Directors since his election in 2001. W. Robert Berkley previously held a number of positions in the Company, including senior vice president-specialty operations, overseeing the operations of the specialty segment, and president of Berkley International, LLC, with responsibility for the Company’s international segment. Before joining W. R. Berkley Corporation, W. Robert Berkley worked as an investment banker at Merrill Lynch & Company. He is currently Chairman of the Board of NCCI Holdings, Inc., an industry-based organization that manages the nation’s largest database of workers’ compensation insurance information.

Founded in 1967, W. R. Berkley Corporation is an insurance holding company that is among the largest commercial lines writers in the United States and operates in five segments of the property casualty insurance business: specialty insurance, regional property casualty insurance, alternative markets, reinsurance and international.

Contact:

W. R. Berkley Corporation
Karen A. Horvath, 203-629-3040
Vice President – External Financial Communications
POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

Tags:

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

Your insurance score will affect your premium

posted by Steven Wevodau

WBNS-10TV

 

James Gambert is 68 and has never filed an auto- or home-insurance claim. No fender benders. No hail damage. Not so much as a cracked windshield.

 

So when his insurance premiums almost doubled in two years, he wanted to know why.

“My agent looked at me and said, ‘Boy, you got to get your financial house in order,’  ” Gambert said, shaking his head as he recalled the conversation.

“I said: ‘What do you mean? I got a credit score that’s about 830.’ He says: ‘We have 15 categories of insurance scores, and you’re in category 13; 1 is the best. You figure it. You do the homework.’

“I left his office in shock.”

That’s how the Pickerington resident learned of something the insurance industry rarely discusses with policyholders: insurance scores, which can determine how much you’ll pay for insurance or whether you’ll get coverage at all.

Unlike their better-known cousins, credit scores, insurance scores are seldom, if ever, the subject of direct-mail offers, Internet banner ads or TV ditties sung by guitar-toting pitchmen wearing pirate outfits.

Insurance scores are based on many of the same factors that go into the calculation of credit scores, which is why they’re sometimes called credit-based insurance scores: Have you ever declared bankruptcy? What’s your payment history? How much credit — and what type of credit — are you carrying now?

The insurance industry says the idea behind the scores is simple: How you handle your financial affairs is a good predictor of how many insurance claims you’ll file on your auto or home.

“I think it’s important to point out that most people benefit from an insurance score because of the fact that most people manage their finances quite well,” said Mary Bonelli, spokeswoman for the Ohio Insurance Institute, an industry trade group.

You can try to see your insurance scores, but keep in mind that insurers get scores from different places: A given insurer might use its own formula, or it might obtain scores from a company such as Fair Isaac or ChoicePoint. The latter will send you your home and auto scores for $12.95 apiece, according to its Web site, choicepoint.com.

If you want to improve your insurance scores, pay your bills on time, keep credit-card balances low and apply for new credit accounts only when necessary. Also, be sure to check your credit reports for errors.

Gambert and his wife obtained their credit reports and found several mistakes, including an entry indicating the couple had 22 open credit accounts; in reality, they had five.

By clearing up those errors, they’ve been able to boost their insurance scores — and thereby lower their rates substantially.

“I’m saving — between the two: home and car — at least $500 a year …,” Gambert said. “And the only difference is the score they’ve given me.”

kurt.ludlow@10tv.com

Tags: , ,

Sunday, January 18th, 2009 Other, Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

Greenberg Grumbles Over AIG Deal

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

Maurna Desmond, 01.06.09, 4:35 PM ET

 

 

 

Maurice “Hank” Greenberg is hammering away at the U.S. government, trying to get it to abandon its plan to dismember his beloved American International Group.

After questioning AIG’s latest asset disposal on Tuesday, the feisty octogenarian told Forbes.com that the current plan to pare down the insurer and use the funds raised to pay down its government bets was the wrong idea at the wrong time. “It’s not going to work,” he said. “Selling assets in this market at this time is not a very clever strategy. AIG was the greatest insurance company in history, to sell those assets to competitors at these prices makes no sense.”

Greenberg wants AIG to cease divestures and renegotiate its government bailout package, which he thinks was a raw deal. Whether he has a point is open to debate — other companies that received federal assistance weren’t necessarily threatening to bring down the world financial system without imminent aid — but Washington has been inconsistent in the terms of its recent spate of private-sector aid. (See “GMAC Pays Up For Its Tarp.”)

“They’re only in a pickle because they haven’t negotiated the same terms that Citigroup got,” he said. “Why did they first get a plan that had 14.0% interest? Was it to help some of the counterparties?” he said, citing Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley as two of the most significant companies that were involved in credit-market deals with AIG. Greenberg, who takes his nickname from a home-run-hitting Hall of Fame baseball player, was referring to the original bailout, which included an $85.0 billion loan at 8.5 percentage points above the London interbank offered rate, which at the time of the deal was 2.89%, plus a 2.0% commitment fee. The deal also gave the Federal Reserve ownership of most of the company, so, in effect, the high interest was money coming out of one government pocket and into another.

As AIG fire sales continue, Greenberg said, AIG’s once-enviable position in the insurance business is quickly eroding. He said this is largely due to the exodus of its top people. On Monday, Joe Boren, chief executive of AIG’s environmental division and a decades-long veteran jumped ship, while in December another insurance subsidiary, Lexington, lost its chief executive Kevin Kelley. “The problem is they are losing people by the day,” Greenberg said. “There is uncertainty and they are nationalized. Who wants to work for a nationalized company?”

Earlier Tuesday, Greenberg filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of a letter to Chief Executive Edward Liddy of AIG, complaining that the firm is selling its HSB Group subsidiary for far too little. “Among other things, we would like to know what specifically did the board do to ensure that the company was sold for the highest available price,” he wrote in the letter.

Last month, Munich Re arranged to buy HSB Group from AIG for $742.0 million. HSB is the parent company of the Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance, which provides insurance and reinsurance on risks related to equipment malfunctions and engineering. Munich Re said the purchase fits with its strategy of U.S. expansion–plus, from its perspective, the price was right. (See “Munich Re Makes Room For AIG’s Boiler.”)

The problem is that everything that is being sold seems to be going for a song these days as companies fight to survive the credit crisis by selling some of their best assets to vulture investors who are in a position to pay rock-bottom prices. The pressure to sell is especially intense for American International Group, which has to sell some of its business units to help repay $150.0 billion in loans and other aid from the U.S. government, which now owns 79.9% of the firm. The insurance company teetered on the verge of bankruptcy in September as a result of its heavy exposure to soured credit default swaps and other financial products. (See “AIG’s New Deal” and “AIG’s Slow Holiday Sales“)

Greenberg, who ran the insurer for 38 years, was forced out in 2005, has been a vocal and prolific critic of the government bailout from the get-go and views the HSB sale as another step towards the insurer’s demise. He is demanding an explanation from AIG’s board as to why it is selling the unit at a “distressed” price and for more details about the sale process.

“Certainly, selling major assets at fire-sale prices is not a viable strategy for reviving the company or even repaying the government,” Greenberg said in the latest letter.

Greenberg and affiliates own a little over a tenth of AIG, not counting the eventual Fed stake, which was up 5 cents, to $1.71, during afternoon trading in New York. That’s a 96.9% discount from its year ago price.

Thomson Financial contributed to this article.

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

Timeless and Time-Tested Warren Buffett Watch Predictions

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

cnbc.com
| 26 Dec 2008 | 04:40 PM ET

As a new year approaches, it is customary for journalists to make predictions about the future.  This time around, CNBC.com has a collection of prognostications from CNBC bloggers on a special page: Predictions ‘09.
Predictions 09 -- A CNBC Special Report

Predictions 09 -- A CNBC Special Report

Last year around this time, Warren Buffett Watch offered its Eight redictions for ‘08 .. and Beyond

In keeping with Buffett’s long-term way of looking at things, the eight predictions were intentionally on the ‘timeless’ side of the predicting spectrum.

Here they are again, with a little bit of editing.  This could be the start of a new holiday tradition!

—————–

Warren Buffett became one of the wealthiest people in the world by making predictions and putting money behind those predictions.  Every time he buys a stock or a business or some other investment, he’s forecasting the future. 

Judging by the incredible returns of his holding company Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett and his colleagues are very good at making those predictions.  

Of course, it helps when you can give your predictions plenty of time to come true.  That’s one reason Buffett’s favorite holding period for investments in “outstanding businesses with outstanding managements” is “forever.”  After all,  ”We don’t get paid for activity, just for being right. As to how long we’ll wait, we’ll wait indefinitely.”

With that in mind, here are Warren Buffett Watch’s ‘timeless’ predictions.

1.  Recessions can’t be avoided forever.  As 2007 was coming to a close, Buffett told our Becky Quick that if unemployment picks up significantly, the “dominoes” will fall and the U.S. economy will fall into recession in 2008.   He was right, but not alarmed.  “It is the nature of capitalism to periodically have recessions. People overshoot.”  (He told Becky she’s young enough to expect to see 6 or 7 or them.)

2. We’ll survive current and future recessions just as we’ve survived past problems.   As Buffett told us in August, 2007, (and repeated throughout 2008):  ”We’ve got a wonderful economy… There’s never been anything like that in the history of the world. We live seven times better than the people did a century ago on average… We’ve had problems all along. If you look at the last century, we had that Great Depression and World War Two, we had the Cold War, we had the atomic bomb, but the country does well.”

3.  Recessions will create opportunities.   “I made by far the best buys I’ve ever made in my lifetime in 1974. And that was a time of great pessimism and the oil shock and stagflation and all those sort of things. But stocks were cheap.”

 

4.  All stocks won’t be cheap.  Like Ted Williams waiting for the right pitch, a successful investor waits for the right stock at the right price, and it doesn’t happen every day. “What’s nice about investing is you don’t have to swing at pitches. You can watch pitches come in one inch above or one inch below your navel, and you don’t have to swing. No umpire is going to call you out.”  You get in trouble, Buffett says, when you listen to the crowd chanting “Swing, batter, swing!”

 

5.  The crowd will make mistakes.  Buffett cites this piece of advice from his mentor Benjamin Graham: “You’re neither right nor wrong because other people agree with you. You’re right because your facts are right and your reasoning is right—and that’s the only thing that makes you right. And if your facts and reasoning are right, you don’t have to worry about anybody else.”

6.  Investors will mistakenly think falling stock prices are bad.  ”If they reduce the price of hamburgers at McDonald’s today I feel terrific. Now I don’t go back and think, gee, I paid a little more yesterday. I think I’m going to be buying them cheaper today. Anything you’re going to be buying in the future, you want to have get cheaper.”

 

7.  Good times will prompt bad decisions.   In his 2000 Letter to Berkshire shareholders, Buffett compared the crowd that buys big when prices are high to Cinderella at the ball.  “They know that overstaying the festivities - that is, continuing to speculate in companies that have gigantic valuations relative to the cash they are likely to generate in the future - will eventually bring on pumpkins and mice. But they nevertheless hate to miss a single minute of what is one helluva party. Therefore, the giddy participants all plan to leave just seconds before midnight. There’s a problem, though: They are dancing in a room in which the clocks have no hands.”

8.  There will be more dancing at another wild party followed by another painful hangover.  Looking back at the Internet bubble, Buffett is quoted as saying, “The world went mad. What we learn from history is that people don’t learn from history.”

Tags: , , ,

Friday, December 26th, 2008 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

Managers say: suit yourself

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

By Alison Maitland

Published: December 22 2008 20:07 | Last updated: December 22 2008 20:07

When a case was made for Chubb employees to choose the hours that suit them, John Finnegan, chief executive of the US insurance group, was unconvinced.

“To be honest, I initially viewed the reported benefits of flexible work hours with some scepticism,” he says. “As most CEOs would, I saw it as an employee accommodation programme with a cost. I didn’t know you could at the same time maintain or increase productivity.”

He was persuaded to back a trial of a programme devised by the Bold Initiative, a New York non-profit organisation, because it incorporated targets for improving performance and held teams and their managers accountable for achieving these.

The results convinced him the approach could work even in tough times, because of its positive impact on productivity and employee engagement. Under the programme, managers set the parameters and approve the work plan, but team members collectively determine “leaner” ways of working that accommodate individual flexibility.

Team members have also become more adaptable to change – useful in today’s economic turbulence – and more willing to act on their own initiative. “If there’s an unexpected absence, they jump in,” he says.

The impact of flexible working in a downturn is the subject of fierce debate. When the UK government announced this month it would press on with extending the right to request flexible working to parents of children up to 16, some business lobbies protested that the measure would impose additional costs. The EEF manufacturers’ body called it “a bad message to business”. A government official countered that the benefits outweighed the costs and would help the economy through recession.

Since its first pilot with 17 people in 2004, Chubb has brought 400 of its 10,000 workforce into the programme and now plans to extend it further.

“It’s a business initiative first and foremost,” says Rolando Orama (pictured left), a senior vice-president who heads Chubb’s Chicago operation, handling claims across the Midwest. Of his team of 163 people, 120 work non-standard schedules. The others stick to a regular 8am-5pm routine by choice.

One team member starts at 6am and finishes at 2.30pm so she can complete her college studies. Another spends Fridays in summer working from his boat on Lake Michigan, using a laptop, mobile phone and instant messaging. A third has cut eight hours of commuting by working at home twice a week, which gives him more time for his young family and essentials such as doctors’ appointments.

Everyone’s schedule is available to view on a shared calendar, so the team knows whom to call in an emergency. The programme is suspended for business presentations that everyone must attend and during holiday peaks.

Mr Orama, who works a day a week from home, reels off a list of improvements in the team’s productivity: an increase from 82 per cent to 91 per cent in customers contacted within 24 hours; a jump from 90 per cent to 100 per cent in timely benefit payments to claimants; and business cover extended by three hours a day thanks to some employees starting earlier and others finishing later.

In the US, Barack Obama, the president-elect, has spoken positively about flexibility. The Washington Post last month cited a letter he wrote to Department of Labor employees, saying: “I believe that it’s time we stopped talking about family values and start pursuing policies that truly value families, such as paid family leave, flexible work schedules and telework, with the federal government leading by example.”

Paul Volcker, former chairman of the US Federal Reserve and head of Mr Obama’s economic recovery advisory board, is also a board director of the Bold organisation. Bea Fitzpatrick, Bold’s chief executive, believes its emphasis on business benefits, as well as individual employees’ needs, makes it a tool for the downturn. “We’re finding the more constrained companies are financially, the more interested they are in spreading this approach,” he says.

Employees have come up with more efficient ways of working at the headquarters of Costco, says John Matthews, head of human resources at the warehouse club chain. Traditionally, for example, people in the accounting department worked overtime during peak periods and were underemployed at slacker times. “When we turned the issue over to our employees, they designed a schedule to eliminate all overtime, speed up the [book] closing process and maintain the high level of accuracy in the reports,” he says.

Productivity has improved, and overtime has fallen by 42 per cent year on year. About 10 per cent of the 3,000 staff at the Seattle HQ are enlisted in a Bold programme, and more will join them next year. “People generally appreciate us listening to them and not wasting their time,” Mr Matthews says.

Flexible schedules offer another business benefit in difficult economic times, according to Patty Dudek, vice-president of IBM’s WebSphere development, which develops software for customers’ e-business applications. The company recently introduced round-the-clock software development, with work passing between 1,000 developers in different time zones. The global team can update a product in four to six months, versus 18-24 months five years ago.

Rather like the Bold initiative, IBM’s approach combines a focus on productivity with individual flexibility. Many developers split their working day into chunks around their personal duties and this makes the team more responsive, Ms Dudek says.

“Customers need something different than they said they needed three months ago, and they need it in days to respond to new business priorities,” she says. “If we did not support flexibility, I’d be so constrained by how quickly I could react.”

As a senior executive, she also works a flexible schedule and believes it is a way of retaining and motivating good people. “If we want top talent to work on something and we give them all the flexibility they need to balance their lives, they’re then more willing and able to step up to the challenge when we need them to drop everything.”

At Chubb, Mr Finnegan does not easily envisage flexibility applying to top executives such as himself, on the grounds that “it’s tough to measure what I do every day in terms of output”.

But he is convinced of the advantages of a performance-driven approach. He likens it to the way Toyota gained competitive advantage in the global motor industry in the 1980s with its “lean” manufacturing methods.

“It’s making people more responsible and accountable for what they do, like the Toyota breakthrough in the way cars are made,” he says. “The test is that they can do it better than they’ve done it before.”

Tags: , ,

Monday, December 22nd, 2008 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

W.Va. Named #1 “Legal Hellhole”—Again

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

A new list of judicial “hellholes” once again singles out the state of West Virginia as the worst area in the nation for business, citing the state for “its near perfect storm of anti-business rulings, massive lawsuits and cozy relationships between the personal injury bar, the state attorney general and some in the judiciary.”

The list is released annually by the American Tort Reform Foundation, funded in part by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Besides what it calls “perennial” West Virginia, the list of the nation’s “most unfair civil court jurisdictions” includes South Florida and Cook County, Ill.

Newcomers to the list are Clark County, Nev.; Atlantic County, N.J.; and Los Angeles County, Calif. Back on the list are Alabama’s Macon and Montgomery counties, which officials say are returning to the unwanted spotlight “after respective absences.”

The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America said the list “sheds a spotlight on some of the worst judicial environments in the country and highlights the importance of fighting for a balanced civil justice system in 2009.”

David Golden, director of commercial lines for PCI, noted, “The cost of an unfair judicial system in today’s economy can be measured in lost jobs, lower tax revenues and higher costs for consumers.”

He added, “The last thing states need right now is an unfair judicial system that makes it even harder to generate new jobs, attract new companies to the state, keep doctors and make insurance affordable, as consumers ultimately foot the bill for runaway litigation.”

West Virginia tops the list, according to ATRF officials, because the state’s highest court has a “history of plaintiff-biased decisions, paying damages to those who are not injured, allowing mass trials, permitting lawsuits outside the workers’ compensation system, rejecting long-established legal principles, and welcoming plaintiffs’ lawyers from other states to take advantage of its generous rulings.”

To make matters worse, the report said, “West Virginia is one of only two states that do not guarantee a right to appeal a civil verdict, even if a multimillion-dollar award is clearly excessive under the law or the trial court violated procedural fairness by allowing a jury to decide punitive damages before it found a defendant legally responsible for a claim.”

Moreover, the report said, “There also may be no state with a closer alliance between the state attorney general and politically connected personal injury lawyers—an alliance that “has wreaked havoc at the expense of civil justice,” the report concluded.

South Florida is next because it “maintains its reputation for legally excessive awards and plaintiff-biased rulings that make it a launching pad for class actions, dubious claims and novel legal theories creating new types of lawsuits,” the report said.

It noted that this year South Florida was home to a record-breaking award in an asbestos case. “And though medical malpractice claims may be coming down off their peak, the area is still home to some of the largest such awards,” it added.

Cook County, or Chicago, is on the list because it has a reputation for “hostility toward corporate defendants and has long been known as a receptive host for lawsuits.”

Cook County still hosts significantly more than its proportional share of lawsuits in the state, as its courts permit “forum shopping” whereby lawyers from other parts of the state or country can bring lawsuits with little or no connection to Cook County, the report added.

Beyond the Judicial Hellholes, the report also calls attention to several additional jurisdictions that bear watching for suspicious or negative developments in litigation, histories of abuse, or laudable efforts to improve themselves.

These include the Rio Grande Valley and Gulf Coast of Texas; Madison County, Ill.; Baltimore, Md.; and the city of St. Louis and St. Louis & Jackson counties, Mo.

Tags: , ,

Saturday, December 20th, 2008 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

All Primary Insurance Rating Outlooks Now Negative, S&P Says

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

New York-based Standard & Poors changed its rating outlook for personal lines insurers to negative late last week, indicating that ratings downgrades are expected to outpace upgrades over the next 12-to-18 months.

The rating agency also expects the industry overall to record an underwriting loss for 2008, with a property-casualty combined ratio in the 103-104 range for the year, a rating analyst said yesterday.

During a conference call, S&P Director John Iten, explaining the sector outlook revision, said there has been a dramatic change in the distribution of individual outlooks for personal lines insurers rated by S&P. As of mid-November, 26 percent of personal lines insurers now have a negative outlook attached to their ratings, compared to 2007, when no personal lines insurer ratings carried a negative outlook, he said.

Weak operating performance stemming from deteriorating underwriting results and poor investment performance partially explain the individual changes, he noted.

On the underwriting front, he said that while the entire property-casualty industry combined ratio is 105.6, according to a report released by the Insurance Services Office this week, the combined ratio for personal lines insurers is likely one or two points worse.

The negative outlook for personal lines now matches S&Ps outlook for commercial lines, Mr. Iten said during the conference call. He explained that the negative outlook for commercial lines has been in place since August.

While he listed a string of concerns that prompted the August outlook change, Mr. Iten noted some good news on the commercial lines side.

Public surveys have showed a slight moderation in price declines in the third quarter and there is anecdotal evidence that this has continued in the fourth quarter, he said.

Its still too early to call a turn in the commercial underwriting cycle, he warned, however, explaining why S&P is maintaining the negative commercial outlook. Prior to the August revision, this outlook had been stable since June 2005.

Since November, S&P has downgraded seven commercial lines while upgrading four, with three of the downgrades coming in December. So the ratings trend clearly has been negative, Mr. Iten observed.

The distribution of ratings outlooks—the best indicator of future ratings actions has moved from 7 percent negative in 2007 to 30 percent negative in 2008.

While the sector outlook reflects ongoing concerns about pricing, as well as third-quarter catastrophe losses, lower investment income and a very substantial increase in unrealized capital losses, Mr. Iten said S&Ps primary concern has been the rapid deterioration in underwriting profitability.

The pricing cycle has been unfavorable since 2004, and by August we believed that prices had fallen to the point that we really believed that the sectors underwriting results, which had been favorable for three years, would turn into underwriting losses starting in 2009.

In light of the recent ISO report, that timetable has been accelerated by this years hurricane losses, he said. He predicted the industry will report a combined ratio of 103-104 for the year.

Underwriting results for some companies could be reduced to the point that operating performance no longer supports current ratings, Mr. Iten said.

Other factors that could push down ratings for some commercial insurers include:

• Realized and unrealized losses on equities and fixed income investments, which have reduced capital, in some cases below levels contemplated in current ratings

• Capital market constraints making it difficult to raise capital through debt and equity issuance

On the other hand, positive factors include the capital adequacy for most commercial insurers, which was strong leading into 2008, as well as the strength of their reserve positions, which was adequate or somewhat redundant.

Echoing some of the negative comments he made about commercial lines during his discussion of the personal lines sector, Mr. Iten said weak operating performance and reduced financial flexibility prompted last weeks outlook change for auto and homeowners insurers.

Capital positions of personal insurers have been drained away by cat losses, mainly funded by primary insurers rather than reinsurers and by declines in asset value.

While S&P is seeing signs of a turnaround to higher pricing in personal auto, the economic downturn is having an adverse impact. Fewer car sales [and] fewer houses being sold mean fewer policies being sold, he said.

The only p-c segment for which S&P maintains a stable outlook is the global reinsurance sector, said Laline Carvalho, also a director. She explained that reinsurers have maintained better pricing discipline and have better enterprise risk management and limited asset exposure to the subprime crisis due to conservative investment postures.

Tags: , , ,

Friday, December 19th, 2008 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off

Catastrophes cost industry $50 billion in 2008, claim 238,000 lives: Swiss Re

POSTED BY STEVEN WEVODAU

LONDON—Catastrophes have taken more than 238,000 lives in 2008 and cost property insurers more than $50 billion, making the year the second costliest in terms of insured catastrophe losses, a new study by Swiss Reinsurance Co. reveals.

Natural catastrophes accounted for $43 billion of the total losses and $7 billion were from manmade disasters such as explosions and fires, Swiss Re said in the sigma study.

The $50 billion in losses rank 2008 as the second costliest year for insurers behind 2005, when heavy storms caused much of the $107 billion in losses paid by insurers, Swiss Re points out.

Hurricane Ike was the most expensive natural disaster in 2008, causing $20 billion in losses for insurers, the report says. A ruptured pipeline on Varanus Island in Western Australia was the costliest manmade disaster, resulting in losses to insurers and the local economy of at least $1 billion.

Tropical cyclone Nargis was the deadliest event of the year. The storm that struck Myanmar killed 138,400, Swiss Re says.

Tags: ,

Thursday, December 18th, 2008 Steven Wevodau - Property & Casualty Comments Off